Sleep In Heavenly Peace by M. William Phelps

I am an avid reader or true crime books. I have read several of your books. This would be the very first time I have ever felt troubled by any true crime writer. I have no finished the book, perhaps 20 pages from doing so. I purposly stopped because the outcome will be what it is.
What troubles me is the writings of Quote: no mother could ever not know there child was pregnan, no once but several times curious what this was basd upon. I work in the health field, by no means a Doctor but more direct contact hen they have. I IS MORE than posible. My sibling herself actually did this to our surprise. My other extended family are law enforcement and while I listened to their stories I never interjected. These seems to be some code amongst them. Please consider these are famly. I also worked with batter woman inMANY circumstances that NEVER say the truh, crazy as that sounds the years of being held emotional bondage has a everlasting afect. I come from a large family and NO one of us see it the same. I am personally the one that paints to home as wonderful fearful from a young age to date! I still carry things that needed legal address and found the system to be blameful rather than understanding and troubled enough to go over and above the expectation. I also noted in several areas of the book where it was cleary one sided as though nothing this woman was or could have said was already labled against her. She might be guilty as can be. My concern is, simple, when a writer prepares his book and does his homework there is nothing in the book that I having bought over at least a thoussand or more,, should never choose a side and many times I noted the predjudice in the legal favour? To say, quote that there is no way and she clearl gave these staements freely on her own is not fair true nor from a writers point should have been inserted in such a way that persuaded a reader against her. can a mother control a child now adult that way? YES! your research then limited itself to those that have never even began a work in more than the ones they studied? is that fair/ is she guilty perhaps. But the things I see, lived, have been touched by IS YES THERE IS THA pathectic control,,, YS even after death, it is called abuse, to which you as well as the prosecutor made comment now was her time? I say again she might be so guilty it is a shame. I write because I see so much that was NT addressed in the human control, the reasons they still continue to live under this control when YU supported the authorities view? o me that is a small portion of truth! I read this book and saw her guilty before it was actually stated and named. Giving a staement under her own permission? means nothing to me. Again family, patients have done the same, stateing they are intelligent, articullate, etc,,, my own sister and brother have a abvr=e avg IQ, no common sense, but very intelligent,believing they were helping and found them selves after so many hours doubtin them selves, being quetioned to a point they began to doubt themselves. so what happenedm=, guilty, after several years verdict changed, but really, so much writing supporting one side was a direct imact on how they were viewed! oday my opinion has greatly changed on how a writer states he or she is wrting a book about such a saddness to bring truth. I found her guilty before the jury did simply based upon biased point of view. I a sorry. Not once have I ever expressed thia and concerend at doing so. Again guilty she might be, it was there very presentation and how written that made me think,, this could be me, different circumstances butstill mr. Your book should not have ever made a reader to find guilt until the end and even that ony because a book was written with no virw point from one sider or the other! I am dorry I spent the money and read the book.